Aside from me not wanting to make myself a target, wouldn't the constant threat of the bullet be more effective than the single use bullet itself?

There is no target, living or otherwise, I could see myself wanting to exercise such an ability against. If anything I'd probly make a video with some kind of message important to me and taking the shot into the ground somewhere important to hopefully say something with the act of giving up such an opportunity.

my lawyer has advised me not to answer this question

on a serious note all of the options most people would think of have way too tight security for this to be possible lol

I genuinely don't know because all of the people I would appreciate to not exist also don't live near me, or it would be actually impossible to get to them.

i think i'd have to target [this text removed for legal reasons]

well, one bullet can still hit multiple targets if it goes through the first N-1 of them and they are lined up just right

Highly depends on what a bullet is, if we count a missile as a bullet, then i'd probably fire it at one of putin's bunkers. If it is just a bullet.. well then i have no idea, bc security on all the interesting people/things is waaaay too tight to get a shot in

i wouldn't, the threat of shooting someone randomly for any or no reason is more effective than the bullet.